If Global Cooling, America Loses!

When Lysenkoism collapsed as a viable theory, Soviet Russia science lost credibility around the world. The fall to junk science of Lysenkoism endorsed by the Communist Party tainted all Russian academics and science. The Soviet Union’s backing of Lysenkoism contributed to it’s diminished standing around the world. Lysenkoism was the USSR in the eyes of the world.

Likewise, the prestige of the United States and its institutions is hostage to Climate Change (aka, Global Warming). If global cooling becomes a reality, who will want to attend Harvard, a university that pushed Climate Change? What credibility will U.S. courts backing global warming, U.S. military, and intelligence agencies singing the song of catastrophic doom retain if climate change forecasts are wrong? Will the wailing of President Obama and the Congress be forgotten in a world cooling and witnessing growing glaciers? This will not happen. No nation or world organization will try to save America’s face. Who trusts a fool?

If temperatures stay flat or decrease, oceans do not rise, and glaciers continue to grow, who will believe NOAA or NASA? A nation suckered in by the ravings of the wannabe clergyman Al Gore who started a new religion of which he was head priest, teaching salvation via abstinence from combustion will be dismissed as a nation populated and run by buffoons who fooled the world into believing a fairy tale. Will any pronouncement rolling out from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Berkley, or any U.S. university be listened to? Will ”The Harvard Review” be seen as a glorified comic book when it is evident that “The Earth Is Not On Fire”? Who will believe research coming out of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution if glaciers are growing? The Congress of the United States, NSA, CIA, the Joint Chiefs of the military have all proclaimed global warming is the greatest threat to humanity and control everything you do (one has to wonder if these people have little swastikas tattooed on their asses) given their need to control. Will the collapse of on-demand food supply caused by global cooling and the ensuing global hunger cool the world to U. S. leadership? Yep! And, maybe, the public will understand why the people who got rich transferring production offshore, have not won a military conflict in 50 years and destroyed the middle class are to be ignored which is a fate worse than death to elitists and a guaranteed road to loss of power at all levels.

Questions Climate Change Alarmists Do Not Answer

Note: Because Google, Youtube, Facebook and most social media have become propaganda tools, check sources that date back to 2000 online books and research articles. Do not believe anything you read here, check yourself, then decide.

Why those pushing Man Made Climate Change do not ask the questions below and/or do not know the information? The answer is simply that, religious fanatics are terrified of anything that upsets their world view. so, if you are a Climate Change fanatic stop hear and don’t waste your time. On the other hand, If you think and are capable of independent thought, read on.


1. What is the estimated highest temperatures increase expected from man-made caused warming? Ans: 5C

2. What is the highest possible temperature increase that could be expected during the current interglacial warmup if there was no man-made CO2? Ans: 8C

3. What is the estimated height of ocean rise expected from man-made warming? Ans: 3m

4. What is the highest level of ocean rise that could be expected during the current interglacial warmup period if there is no man-made CO2? Ans: 5m

5. If a volcano exploded similar to the VEI-8 explosion around 536 AD, will the earth cool? Ans: Yes What is the probability of such an explosion in next 100 years? Ans: 10%

Note: When it happens, the negative consequences will be horrific!

6. Is climate change effected by the sun’s quieting, the earth’s magnetic field decreasing and the magnetic poles moving ? Ans: Yes

7. Does Earth’s absidal, perihelion and axial precessions effect climate? Ans: Yes

8a. How many submarine volcanoes was known when the theory of man made climate change proposed? Ans: 10,000

8b. When was global warming recognized as an issue? Ans: 1995

8c.When did NASA acknowledge the number of volcanoes was greater than 10,000d? Ans: 2005

8d. How many submarine volcanoes are estimated to be active? Ans: 70,000

St. Louis: A City Destroyed

The promise made was a new vibrant city full of life and activity. The university and government experts were so sure and so confident. What they and their computer simulation models delivered was a stillborn city empty of life and economic activity. The experts tore down homes of the poor and low middle class along with their functioning communities. They were replaced with dead, sterile public housing with broken communities. Massive highways gouged out vast tracts of the city, dissecting what was once working and thriving communities into isolated enclaves, just shells of what the communities and activities they had a decade before. Yet, somehow, these visionaries and urban experts felt it was imperative to run the highways to be directly next to Anheuser Bush brewery complex, and other well-connected businesses would benefit from quick access to the highway for transport and executives commuting in from their suburban homes dislocating tens of thousands of families living path cleared to make room for massive highways and the off and on access ramps. So many lives shattered and uprooted to benefit a few well connected to government. Magically, the homes of those pushing the highways and well connected never had to worry about their homes or neighborhoods. The highways magically bypassed them. The rich, the educated elites, the overpaid bureaucrats laid waste to St. Louis in much the way an invading army would and then return to their intact homes and neighborhoods. The trusting citizens of St. Louis lives were turned upside down as St. Louis had its economic throat cut by the very same do-gooders who cut all loans and to the city. This act of sabotage guaranteed the dispossessed would live in the suburb.

When done, a giant Arch stood were homes, businesses, and neighborhoods had stood. An Arch built at great expense which has never been recovered. Highways crisscrossed the city. Streetcars that transported thousands were gone. The people of St. Louis were betrayed by their government. Their lives and routines pointlessly destroyed to feed the hubris of government and university planning elites. Elites, who gained financially always as so many in St. Louis, lost everything that made life meaningful. So, why should we believe anything these so-called elites, bureaucrats, and elites tell us as gospel. Has not their collective failures taught us nothing! St. Louis is a testament to their deceit, incompetence, and greed.

Climate Change: A Snow Job?

Fake Science?

Most people know that climate science is composed of many disciplines and the underlying assumption most scientists who study climate accept as true is CO2 drives all climate change. 1 The problem is, if CO2 is does not drive climate change, or not to the extent currently thought, climate predictions will not be accurate. 2a, 2b At the same time, these same scientists are trying to understand climate, they are trying to integrate many separate sciences needed to understand climate. Integrating natural history, atmospheric and physical sciences, biological sciences, mathematics, earth sciences, statistics and computational analysis is a complex undertaking not easily hurried. Theories have to be tested and verified which take time. What most do not know is that many of the theories, real time measurements and tools used to understand climate are not even 50 years old. 3 What most people do not know is many of the underlying assumptions many climate theories are based on have not been vetted. 4 What is worse than a shameful lack of verification of climate change assumptions and theories is climatologists taking the position that only humanity is causing climate change. Natural history has been made moot by human kind. Earth’s current interglacial warming period which began around 12,000 years ago is irrelevant. It is of no consequence that temperature and sea rise have not reached levels of previous interglacial warming periods. For example, the previous interglacial period lasted 14000 years. Before it ended, the temperature was 5 degrees C warmer and the oceans 8 meters higher than today. The current glacial period and interglacial periods known as the Quaternary glaciation is not an issue. Human kind producing CO2 is the only issue. `That during the current interglacial period the oceans having risen approximately 120 meters (394 feet) and may still be rising during this cycle is of no consequence. 5 Climate change theories make predictions using data that are taken from samples of the past that may or may not be accurate. Temperatures estimates from the past use proxy data. There is no way to actually measure temperature in the past directly. It is important to note that the accuracy of the data and the assumptions used to determine past temperature are based on theories, not proven! The simple fact is that there is no way to verify what the actual temperatures were. Even the assumptions that the sample proxy data accurately reflects the earth’s actual temperature during the time periods studied are just guesses based on theories and assumptions. Again, there is absolutely no way to verify that any proxy data used, accurately mirrors global temperature for a given time period. Statements about CO2 levels in the past are, also, based on proxy data too! 6 The causes of these cool downs and warm ups are not well understood. There are many theories floating around. How long the current warm up will last is not known, or how warm the temperature will be when at its’ peak. This last point is important, so let’s repeat it. There is no way to know how much warmer it will get during the current interglacial warm up. It is not even known if the Quaternary glaciation period is going to continue or if it has ended. 7 Climate researchers do not know how warm the current interglacial warmup will become or when it will end. 8 Any value attributed to man-made causes of global warming is only a guess. The causes of ice ages and warm ups are not understood, so this current warm up could be typical or atypical. It is all guessing. There is no consensus on just how much the sun and the earth’s other dynamic systems influence temperature. Cloud cover, volcanic processes influence temperature, and are constantly changing. Even the Earths’ magnetic field, which controls how much cosmic radiation hits the earth’s atmosphere. Cosmic radiation is theorized to be a factor in cloud formation. Volcanic eruptions, cloud coverage, underwater lava flows, changes in solar output cannot be predicted with any accuracy necessary to give any meaning to computer simulations predicting the impact of one variable – CO2. If we don’t know just how warm this warm-up will be, or how changes in cloud formation, solar activity and vulcanism will change and impact temperature, then how can anyone tell us how much warmer human beings are going to make the earth? There are multiple variables effecting earth’s surface temperature, yet, we are told that only one variable is a factor. This is not science. This is a belief!

According to the IPCC and signatories of the Paris Climate Accord a 2C increase in temperature will be catastrophic! 9a 9b An event that must be stopped at all costs. But, there is no way of knowing if this current interglacial period will reach 5C as it has in previous warm-ups. Are you beginning to understand the stupidity of these people! Animals, vegetation, fish, coral reefs that survived the last interglacial warm up that was 5C warmer will not survive a 2C warmup. They warn you that you must stop the 2C warmup at all costs to save humanity, but they cannot tell you if a 5C increase brought by this current interglacial period is going to happen. If you heard this type of silliness from your teenager, you would tear their room apart looking for the drugs.

Why the effort to convince the public to accept computer simulations as proof? Because, accepting a model as proof, removes the Scientific. Method from the discussion. No proof means no verification by other researchers which takes time to gather the data. A university or scientist eager to publish and secure tenure will find little in the way of glory or funding available verifying someone else’s theory. No proof means no verification by other. Computer models are the heart of climate research and bypass the scientific method. 10 The Scientific Method takes times to do the to gather the data, publish the theory and wait for other scientist to confirm, reject or offer alternative hypothesis. A university or scientist eager to secure funding and increase alumni donations, publish and secure tenure find little in the way of glory or funding following the Scientific Method. The prestige of having the label science is sought , not the work. Public Relations can be used to keep up the illusion. There is no testable theory to prove global warming if the Scientific Method cannot be used. It is the Scientific Method that purged us of charlatans and soothsayers and opened the door to “reason” over “belief” , but it also requires work and time. As there was no testable theory to disprove Ptolemy’s theory of the planets. The ancients were conned by experts who , as today, relied on that con to secure power and wealth. Al Gore has become fabulously wealthy, professors pushing catastrophic warming have secured much funding, politicians have usurped more and more power in the name of stopping global warming. The con was maintained by using an analog computer – the Antikythera. And, just as now, when the model failed, the mechanism could be adjusted to account for the discrepancy in observations and predictions. As we all know today, the analog computer model used to prove Ptolemy’s theory was wrong! What caused its’ downfall? The scientific method came along which required verifiable theory that accurately predicted the motion of the planets. Today, modern day charlatans and their supporting institutions want to take mankind back to the days of old where science did not rule. Snake oil salesman do not do well in the light of science. They do flourish pushing models which can continually be tweaked to continue the con. As in Ptolemy’s time, denial of reality is a must. The all-powerful model must be believed! Empires and civilizations have collapsed from droughts that last decades around the world, but now a long-term drought is proof of man-made global warming. Temperatures are rising and it has to be man-made global warming. The oceans are rising because of man-made global warming. As if they haven’t been rising for thousands of years. Now, that the sham is beginning to wear thin, the new pronouncement of proof that the earth is warming because of man, is the rate of change of this or that variable is unprecedented! Really? Is it not amazing, when a new slant is needed to continue the narrative that the very tools that are not necessarily that accurate or reflective of global climate in the past are once again used to prop up failing models.

March – April 2018 Snow Cover North America.

What if all those global warming experts and institutions who have abandoned science, the universities, governments around the world, the UN, the computer modelers, NOAH, Al Gore, Europe, and all the scientists with their expensive grants pushing global warming got it wrong! What if, it is changes in the sun, the Earth’s changing magnetic field, fluctuations in cosmic radiation, changes in cloud coverage and volcanism that brings about ice ages and warm-ups, and humanity’s production of CO2 is not driving climate change? 11 climate change? 12 What if the earth enters a serious cool down and, people die not from the consequences of warming but cooling? How does one respond toa massive blunder that is up there with “the Earth is the center of the universe and flat”, Lysenkoism, or worse, Mao’s Great Leap Forward that results in the deaths of millions How to deal with all those smug elitists, the over bearing bureaucrats, journalists and news anchors who pushed an error, while mocking dissenters with all the enthusiasm of the priests who in past inquisitions persecuted non-believers to enforce the faith? What happens if food production decreases and people starve from a global cool down? Ice Ages bring not only cooling and reduced growing seasons, but great droughts that reduce food production too. 13 If people suffer greatly from a sudden and sever cool down, do they not have a right to seek justice, bring down the governments and politicians who pushed warming? Should they legally take revenge on the bureaucrats, scientific experts, billionaires, media elites, and people like Al Gore and Elon Musk who became rich pushing global warming? What will be the fate of judges who now condone acts of violence and destruction in the name of global warming?

Arnold Roquerre