Not only has it been much, much warmer before in last 2,000 years, it has even warmer in previous interglacial warm ups. The Earth is still here. Huh, crazies run telling everyone that the Earth is going to die because of warming. Fascinating to watch truly mediocre people who are palmed off to the public as smart. CO2 concentrations were higher in the the past and life survived. In all the banter from scientists telling us the great death from man made global warming, you never hear them tell how warm this interglacial period can get and how the oceans rise if those previous temperatures are reached against. We are to accept these experts from Harvard, Yale, Princeton and M.I.T. that the greatest threat to mankind is global warming. We are told there will be droughts and it will hot, but nothing said the hot areas that had great droughts previous cool downs including the Little Ice Age. Huh, why the silence about the natural history of the Earth during cool period? And, why is China buying land in Africa that before this warm up were the Roman Empire’s grain basket? Seems the Chinese are thinking the conditions that made these now dried lands so productive may be returning.
We, not so bright, are faces with a conundrum. If the Chinese are right, the United States and all the people yelling is the Earth was doomed from warming are wrong! You the reader has to ask yourself if China is right and is able to feed their people and the United States is wrong, does that not mean the Congress and all those Presidents and important people pushing global warming and the end of the worlds were not so bright. If they are wrong, why should anyone anywhere in the world ever listen to anything they have to say And, the follow up question is how did they ascend to positions of power and rank being so obviously incompetent? Is this an indictment against allowing anyone to vote? Is the fault in pushing democracy too far in allowing votes to be cast by people who truly are not capable of understanding the difference between a smooth talking clown and an intelligent leader? If the ship of state drive the ship into an iceberg when the other ships veered out the iceberg’s path, is not how the captain were selected the issue?